[Alta-Logic] March 3: Potential Infinity: A Modal Account (Calgary
Mathematics & Philosophy Lecture)
Richard Zach
rzach at ucalgary.ca
Tue Feb 2 21:00:06 MST 2016
Please mark your calendars: http://ucalgary.ca/mathphil/
<http://ucalgary.ca/mathphil/files/mathphil/cmp-shapiro-art.pdf>
Potential Infinity: A Modal Account
Stewart Shapiro
The Ohio State University
Thursday, March 3, 2016, 3:30 pm
ST 141
Beginning with Aristotle, almost every major philosopher and
mathematician before the nineteenth century rejected the notion of the
actual infinite. They all argued that the only sensible notion is that
of potential infinity. The list includes some of the greatest
mathematical minds ever. Due to Georg Cantor’s influence, the situation
is almost the opposite nowadays (with some intuitionists as notable
exceptions). The received view is that the notion of a merely potential
infinity is dubious: it can only be understood if there is an actual
infinity that underlies it.
After a sketch of some of the history, Prof. Shapiro will analyze the
notion of potential infinity, in modal terms, and assess its scientific
merits. This leads to a number of more specific questions. Perhaps the
most pressing of these is whether the conception of potential infinity
can be explicated in a way that is both interesting and substantially
different from the now-dominant conception of actual infinity. One
might suspect that, when metaphors and loose talk give way to precise
definitions, the apparent differences will evaporate.
A number of differences still remain. Some of the most interesting and
surprising differences concern consequences that one’s conception of
infinity has for higher-order logic. Another important question
concerns the relation between potential infinity and mathematical
intuitionism. In fact, as will be shown, potential infinity is /not/
inextricably tied to intuitionistic logic. There are interesting
explications of potential infinity that underwrite classical logic,
while still differing in important ways from actual infinity. However,
on some more stringent explications, potential infinity does indeed lead
to intuitionistic logic.
(The lecture is based on joint work with Øystein Linnebo.)
*Stewart Shapiro <https://philosophy.osu.edu/people/shapiro.4>* is
O'Donnell Professor of Philosophy at The Ohio State University. He is an
eminent logician and philosopher of mathematics, well-known for his work
on second-order logic and on mathematical structuralism. He is the
author of numerous articles and of five books, including most recently
/Vagueness in Context/ (2006) on vagueness and logic, and /Varieties of
Logic/ (2014) on logical pluralism.
/This talk is the second annual Calgary Mathematics & Philosophy
Lecture, co-sponsored by PIMS <http://www.pims.math.ca/>, the Pacific
Institute for the Mathematical Sciences, and the Department of
Philosophy <http://phil.ucalgary.ca/>. The Mathematics & Philosophy
Lectures aim to introduce topics at the intersection of mathematics and
philosophy to a general academic audience. The event is free & open to
the public; a reception follows./
-------------- next part --------------
Skipped content of type multipart/related
More information about the alta-logic-l
mailing list